Mark Ruffalo as the Hulk
Jun. 8th, 2013 12:23 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Louis Leterrier, director of Now You See Me and The Incredible Hulk:
When people are asking me, because Mark Ruffalo is in this one, who's the better of the Bruce Banners -- both are great; both are fantastic -- but I actually wanted to cast Mark Ruffalo as Hulk and Marvel was like "No, you should get Edward Norton because he's more famous." So you see what I am saying? They are the ones who wanted Edward -- and I was thrilled to meet him and work with him. I wanted Mark Ruffalo. And they were like, "No, no, he just does smart, intellectual movies." Which makes sense, then and there in his career. But that's how I know him. We've stayed in touch and it's why he said "absolutely" when I offered him the part in this one.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/28/louis-leterrier-now-you-see-me_n_3333311.html
You mean we could have had continuity and Marvel just fucked it up all around? They didn't give him a proper script to work with either...
ugh
At least he's the Hulk now...
When people are asking me, because Mark Ruffalo is in this one, who's the better of the Bruce Banners -- both are great; both are fantastic -- but I actually wanted to cast Mark Ruffalo as Hulk and Marvel was like "No, you should get Edward Norton because he's more famous." So you see what I am saying? They are the ones who wanted Edward -- and I was thrilled to meet him and work with him. I wanted Mark Ruffalo. And they were like, "No, no, he just does smart, intellectual movies." Which makes sense, then and there in his career. But that's how I know him. We've stayed in touch and it's why he said "absolutely" when I offered him the part in this one.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/28/louis-leterrier-now-you-see-me_n_3333311.html
You mean we could have had continuity and Marvel just fucked it up all around? They didn't give him a proper script to work with either...
ugh
At least he's the Hulk now...
no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 04:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 06:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 06:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 09:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-08 08:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-06-09 08:35 am (UTC)